Urban Hunting in Joplin: What the City Won’t Say
Uncovering the
overlooked risks, biological contradictions, and emotional fallout behind
Joplin’s urban deer hunting ordinance.
When Joplin’s city council approved its urban bow hunting ordinance on June 16, 2025, they cited neighboring cities Springfield, Columbia, Branson, and Cape Girardeau as models of success. But extensive research reveals a different story: repealed ordinances, wounded wildlife, public backlash, and biological red flags. This article documents the dangerous gap between policy and lived reality and why Joplin’s wooded corridors deserve better.
What the Council Claimed
City officials stated the ordinance would:
- Reduce
deer-vehicle collisions
- Minimize
property damage
- Prevent the
spread of Chronic Wasting Disease (CWD)
- Mirror
“successful” programs in other Missouri cities
They referenced Branson, Columbia and Springfield, as examples of safe, effective urban hunts. Assistant Police Chief Brian Lewis called it “a win for folks.” But what defines success? Revenue from out-of-state permits? Field-dressed meat near public trails? Or simply fewer deer sightings?
Note Branson link is a key distinction worth documenting. The Branson ordinance link opens directly to a downloadable PDF, not a browsable city page like Columbia or Springfield.
What the Record Shows: Red Flags Across
Missouri
Cape Girardeau: Ordinance Repealed by
Voters
In 2012, Cape Girardeau passed an urban hunt ordinance. Within months,
residents launched a petition, gathering 3,911 signatures. In 2013, voters
repealed the ordinance by a 53.7% majority. The hunt was never implemented.
📎 Archery
Wire
📎 Bowhunting.com
Columbia: Quiet Retraction After
Public Discomfort
Columbia allowed urban hunts in the early 2010s but faced growing
discomfort over deer passing away near homes and trails. Hunting zones were
quietly scaled back, and city land was removed from eligibility.
📎 Columbia Tribune
Branson: Field Dressing Near Trails
Branson’s urban hunting ordinance permitted bowhunting on parcels over two acres, but residents voiced concerns about field dressing near public trails and the absence of clear signage. These complaints prompted the city to pass Ordinance 2023-0054, PDF which added discharge restrictions such as prohibiting archery within 150 yards of parks, churches, and schools but stopped short of requiring signage or public notification. The lack of visible warnings left many residents feeling blindsided. My image captures that emotional fallout: frustration, disbelief, and a growing disconnect between policy and lived experience.
📎 Branson Ordinance PDF
📎 Deer & Deer Hunting
Springfield: Wounded Deer and Emotional
Fallout
A deer smashed through two storefront windows on Campbell Avenue before
collapsing and being euthanized by police. Councilwoman Cindy Rushefsky warned
of child safety risks, but was dismissed. Managed hunts continue today, despite
trauma reports.
📎 Springfield News-Leader
📎 Springfield
Urban Deer FAQ
Biological Contradictions Ignored by Council
No CWD Protocols in
Joplin’s Ordinance
Despite citing disease prevention, Joplin’s ordinance includes no CWD
testing or containment protocols. MDC’s own CWD Management Plan outlines targeted
removal zones and mandatory sampling but these are not enforced in urban hunts.
📎 MDC CWD Regulations
Lyme Disease Myth
Council members claimed deer spread Lyme disease. But according to the CDC and Dartmouth Health, deer are not hosts of Lyme bacteria. Ticks acquire the bacteria from small mammals like mice and chipmunks.
Tick Burden and Grooming Imbalance
This year, local does showed unusually high tick burdens. Research
suggests this may be due to a decline in mature bucks, which normally groom
does during rut.
📎 Growing Deer TV
The Collision Claim: Where Are the Numbers?
Missouri cities often justify urban deer hunts by citing deer-vehicle collisions. But according to the Missouri Department of Conservation’s Community Deer Management guide, cities are encouraged to track and document collision data before proposing lethal solutions. Despite this, no standardized, public-facing collision counts are included in the ordinances for Joplin, Branson, Columbia, or Springfield.
Instead, vague references to “increased incidents” are used to support harvests that disproportionately target all deer no matter the age, lactating does and fawns the very demographic needed to stabilize herd dynamics and reduce ecological stress. This undermines the biological rationale and raises serious questions about transparency, ethics, and ordinance integrity.
Late-Season Fawns Signal Herd Stress
Spotted fawns were seen in late August and September well past the normal
birth window. This suggests disrupted breeding cycles, poor nutrition, and herd
imbalance. Original image of late season fawn standing next to Four O' Clock flowers that do not bloom in the spring. Have timestamp from camera to prove the late season fawn image.
📎 Deer & Deer Hunting
📎 Times News Online
Footnote: Youth Hunters and Wounded Deer
Incidents
Across Missouri's urban hunting programs including those cited by
Joplin’s city council youth participation is permitted under state guidelines,
often with minimal archery experience. According to Joplin’s ordinance, hunters
must be at least 16 years old, and anyone under 18 must be accompanied by a
licensed adult who is at least 18 and has completed hunter education or was
born before January 1, 1967.
However, the ordinance still lacks any mandate for archery proficiency, bow draw weight minimums, or anatomical training before urban harvest. This is a critical gap. Ethical bowhunting standards recommend a draw weight of 45–60lbs to ensure humane penetration on adult deer yet many youth hunters use bows in the 30–40 lb range, which may be insufficient for clean harvests, especially in steep-angle urban settings.
Without required skill assessments or anatomical education, urban hunting
becomes a high-risk practice where wounded deer, public trauma, and ordinance
failure are not exceptions, but predictable outcomes. This raises a critical
question:
Could the high number of wounded deer those found collapsed in yards,
storefronts, and trails be linked to inexperienced youth hunters?
📎 Missouri Bowhunters
Association
This is not an indictment of youth hunters it’s a call for stricter skill assessments, buffer zones, and ethical oversight in urban hunting ordinances.
Author Disclaimer
This article is written by Susang6, a long-time wildlife observer, ordinance researcher, and community advocate based in SW, Missouri. All claims are supported by publicly available documentation, firsthand observation, and cited sources. The author does not oppose ethical wildlife management, but advocates for trauma-informed policy, responsible sourcing, and the protection of vulnerable populations human and animal alike. This work is part of an ongoing archive documenting the real-world impact of urban hunting ordinances across Missouri.
Attention Readers: Take Action: Your
Voice Matters
If you live in Joplin or care about the ethical treatment of wildlife and
vulnerable populations contact your city council and ask them to revisit
the urban hunting ordinance. Ask for trauma-informed signage, exclusion zones
near encampments where homeless reside, and biological oversight that reflects
the realities documented here.
📎 Contact
Joplin City Council
📎 Reach Missouri Department
of Conservation
Whether you’re a resident, a conservationist, or someone who’s seen the
quiet suffering of wounded deer and displaced humans, your voice can help close
the gap between policy and reality.